Research

Evidence from the
public record.

ENHANCE publishes structural benchmark reports, case analyses, and methodological frameworks. All findings are derived from publicly disclosed information, evaluated through deterministic, reproducible logic.

Benchmark Report · April 2026
Structural Integrity Index 2026
Evidence from 101 GGGI Projects and 4 Evaluation Reports

A full structural evaluation of 101 publicly disclosed GGGI climate project documents using the ToC:f(x)™ Canonical Framework — 20 binary structural conditions, no discretionary weighting, no probabilistic AI judgement.

Key finding: No project reached Tier I or Tier II structural integrity. 90.1% fell within Tier IV or Tier V. Portfolio mean score: 0.41 out of 1.00.

n = 101 projects + 4 evaluation reports Framework: ToC:f(x)™ v2.0 46 pages
CLASSIFIED UNTIL RELEASE
Case Analysis · April 2026
Six Projects, Three Continents, One Pattern Analysis of the Lowest-Scoring Entries in the GGGI SII 2026

A companion analytical release examining the six projects that scored below 0.30 in the Structural Integrity Index 2026. Three continents. Four countries. Four distinct thematic areas. One shared structural failure.

Key finding: In each case, the project's terminal output does not directly remove the core constraint it was designed to address. Framework substitution. Advisory displacement. Training as terminal output.

n = 6 cases KH34 · GGPI11 · KH26 · KH33 · IN34 · ROC02
CLASSIFIED UNTIL RELEASE
Forthcoming

The work continues.

Phase 2 · 2026
GCF Portfolio: VERA™ + C-FAIR™ Benchmark

Structural misclassification and misallocation in GCF-approved climate projects. 18 cases. 3 continents. Mitigation vs Adaptation. The classification is wrong. The money followed.

CLASSIFIED UNTIL RELEASE
Phase 3 · 2026
Carbon Budget at Risk: GCF Portfolio Assessment

VORTA™ + CBaR™ framework applied to GCF's completed and interim portfolio. The question: is GCF's portfolio structurally aligned with the Carbon Budget?

CLASSIFIED UNTIL RELEASE
Methodology

A score that cannot be explained
cannot be audited.

The Structural Integrity Index is defined as SII = k/20, where k is the number of satisfied structural conditions across the full canonical question set. The denominator is fixed. No discretionary weighting. No probabilistic AI judgement. Ours can be explained in one sentence:

"How many of the 20 structural conditions required for a coherent causal chain are present in the documented design?"
ToC:f(x)™ Canonical Framework v2.0